|
"Pessimist:
One who, when he has the choice of two evils, chooses both."
Oscar Wilde
1854 - 1900
I have to admit it
I am a Sceptic! Actually, it is worse
than that, I am also a Cynic! I suppose this make me a Cynical
Sceptic
but how does one know that they are a Cynic or a
Sceptic? If one peruses the definition of both words and analytically
compares one's own attitude in regards to said definition then,
the conclusion is authenticated although, I would question the
validity or authenticity of something purporting to this conclusion
to actually be factual.
Cyn·ic
1. a person who believes that only selfishness motivates human
actions and who disbelieves in or minimizes selfless acts or
disinterested points of view.
2. (initial capital letter ) one of a sect of Greek philosophers,
4th century b.c., who advocated the doctrines that virtue is
the only good, that the essence of virtue is self-control, and
that surrender to any external influence is beneath human dignity.
3. a person who shows or expresses a bitterly or sneeringly
cynical attitude.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Cynic
Sceptic
1. a person who questions the validity or authenticity of something
purporting to be factual.
2. a person who maintains a doubting attitude, as toward values,
plans, statements, or the character of others.
3. a person who doubts the truth of a religion, esp. Christianity,
or of important elements of it.
4. (initial capital letter ) Philosophy.
a. a member of a philosophical school of ancient Greece, the
earliest group of which consisted of Pyrrho and his followers,
who maintained that real knowledge of things is impossible.
b. any later thinker who doubts or questions the possibility
of real knowledge of any kind.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Sceptic
Being a Cynic or a Sceptic does not mean you can't be spiritual.
I am not an Agnostic or an atheist
Goddess, forbid;
I believe that I am extremely spiritualistic.
I always considered myself a Pessimist rather than an Optimist
although, my partner, Dragonfly, continually suggests
that I am actually a Fatalist
1. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Pessimist+
2. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Optimist+
3. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Fatalist+
Another person's perception of who you are may be defined by
the outward attitude that you convey when, in fact only part
of what is revealed to others is actually true which then, therefore
validates Pyrrho and his followers, assertions that real knowledge
of things is impossible.
In truth, what WE actually KNOW may or may not be True!
To quote one of my own philosophical statements:
"What we know is what we are told ...
What we believe is what we feel and think ...
In between will be found the real TRUTH!"
Allow me to generalise for the purpose of clarity and to
ensure that the reader of this article is not akin to a dog
chasing it's own tail. It is my assertion that there are actually
three kinds of people in this world.
1. Those who believe that they know what is going on around
them.
2. Those who have no idea what is going on around them.
3. Those who KNOW but would rather NOT know what is going
on around them.
With all of the above in mind, please allow me to direct
the reader to the actual topic and true purpose of this Editorial/
article.
"The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is the world's largest
and highest-energy particle accelerator, a synchrotron intended
to collide opposing particle beams of either protons at an energy
of 7 trillion electronvolts (1.12 microjoules) per particle,
or lead nuclei at an energy of 574 TeV (92.0 µJ) per nucleus.[1][2]
The term hadron refers to particles composed of quarks. It is
expected that it will address the most fundamental questions
of physics, hopefully allowing progress in understanding the
deepest laws of nature. The LHC lies in a tunnel 27 kilometres
(17 mi) in circumference, as much as 175 metres (574 ft) beneath
the Franco-Swiss border near Geneva, Switzerland."
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider
So, what we have is a large bunch of scientific geeks sitting
in facilities under a mountain in Switzerland, researching how
to create a "Big Bang" in a controlled (?) environment
as to ascertain the Secrets of the Universe.
What the F*** ?
There is scientific argument for and against the CERN's
Large Hadron Collider which brings me back to assertion that
there are three kinds of people in the world and also, Pyrrho
and his followers, belief that real knowledge of things is impossible.
Just imagine if you will the possibility that those Scientist
who are performing the experiments with the Large Hadron Collider
where actually wrong
well shit
there goes doing
the washing and hanging it on the line today or watering the
grass
quick
let's grab our partner and dive into
the bedroom for a really Big Bang!
Can you imagine how a representative of CERN would announce
to the World their error?
"Hello. Although, we can't actually ascertain that
our research and experiments were responsible for certain global
events, which have recently occurred. There is a distinct possibility
that the recent Earthquakes in India, Haiti and Mexico, the
Tsunamis of Indonesia, Sri Lanka, the Solomon Islands, Fiji
and Brazil and the massive mudslides in Peru could but not necessarily
be due as a result of our experiments and research. If this
is in fact the case, we apologise profusely for any errors in
judgement."
This is after all my opinion and my partner continually
suggests that it is a fatalistic view point and that the Tsunamis
(Tidal Waves), Earthquakes, unscheduled Volcanic eruptions are
NATURAL phenomenon and my "End is Near" assumptions
are invalid.
This may very well be true. I may indeed be over-reacting.
My attitude is probably that of a Paranoid Cynical and Sceptical
Factualist with but
If my assumptions prove to be correct and the Earth does
disappear up its own anus
then I get to say: "Told
You So!"

If you want
to change the world my friends change your thinking first.
| NO
portion, section or part of this Newsletter can be reprinted,
republished or used without the expressed permission in
writing of the Publisher/ Editor of the Newsletter and the
authors of particular articles who retain copyright of their
own individual intellectual property. Intellectual property
thief and Copyright infringement are punishable by law. |

|